Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1198

reference
522-tree-1
name
1198
tree-preservation-order

undefined

522-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.018562 50.899041)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.018520 50.899036,-1.018522 50.899045,-1.018528 50.899052,-1.018537 50.899058,-1.018549 50.899062,-1.018562 50.899064,-1.018575 50.899063,-1.018587 50.899059,-1.018597 50.899053,-1.018603 50.899045,-1.018605 50.899037,-1.018603 50.899029,-1.018597 50.899021,-1.018588 50.899015,-1.018576 50.899011,-1.018563 50.899010,-1.018550 50.899011,-1.018538 50.899015,-1.018528 50.899021,-1.018522 50.899028,-1.018520 50.899036)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL